Jail Policy

Purpose of Jail Jail is a last-resort moderation tool. It removes a member’s access to the community while still allowing staff to communicate with them. Jail is not a punishment by itself; it is a temporary holding measure used only when immediate separation is necessary before a final decision (e.g., ban, unmute (from permenant), or return).


When to Use Jail

  1. Scam or Fraud Investigations

    • Only when there is clear and credible evidence.

    • Never jail someone based on suspicion or hearsay alone.

  2. NSFW / Illegal Content or Possible Hacking

    • If a user is suspected of being hacked and is posting harmful or prohibited content.

    • Jail allows staff to secure the server while confirming if the account was compromised.

  3. Serious Safety Concerns

    • Threats of violence, doxxing, or other severe community safety risks.

    • Jail provides time to verify evidence before escalating to a ban.

  4. Pending Ban Review

    • If a user commits a serious infraction that would normally result in a ban, but staff need additional context (e.g., logs, screenshots, cross-checking).

    • Jail ensures the member cannot cause further disruption while staff finalize a decision.


When NOT to Use Jail

  • Minor infractions (spam, disrespect, light rule-breaking) – these are handled by warnings/infractions and C3 Bot’s auto-mod system. General commands

  • Situations not leading to a ban – if the end result is not a ban, do not jail.

  • Personal conflicts – jail is not a tool for settling disputes or “cool-downs.”


Additional Guidelines

  • Transparency: Always document why jail was used in staff logs.

  • Time Limit: Do not leave members in jail indefinitely. Resolve the case promptly (within 24–48 hours). *If there is a delay due to lack of response from a member you may extend the duration, but do not be the cause of the delay. If you have jailed a member, be sure to use a warm-handoff to another Sr. Mod/Admin in the event of your absence.

  • Appeals: Inform the jailed user how they can dispute or provide context for their case.

Last updated

Was this helpful?